Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
J. appl. oral sci ; 16(4): 280-285, July-Aug. 2008. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-486497

ABSTRACT

In the present study, two types of tests (tensile strength test and polymerization inhibition test) were performed to evaluate the physical and chemical properties of four impression materials [a polysulfide (Permlastic), a polyether (Impregum), a condensation silicone (Xantopren) and a polyvinylsiloxane (Aquasil) ,3; when polymerized in contact with of one conventional (Hemostop) and two experimental (Vislin and Afrin) gingival retraction solutions. For the tensile strength test, the impression materials were mixed and packed into a steel plate with perforations that had residues of the gingival retraction solutions. After polymerization, the specimens were tested in tensile strength in a universal testing machine. For the polymerization inhibition test, specimens were obtained after taking impressions from a matrix with perforations that contained 1 drop of the gingival retraction solutions. Two independent examiners decided on whether or not impression material remnants remained unpolymerized, indicating interference of the chemical solutions. Based on the analysis of the results of both tests, the following conclusions were reached: 1. The tensile strength of the polysulfide decreased after contact with Hemostop and Afrin. 2. None of the chemical solutions inhibited the polymerization of the polysulfide; 3. The polyether presented lower tensile strength after polymerization in contact with the three gingival retraction agents; 4. The polyether had its polymerization inhibited only by Hemostop; 5. None of the chemical solutions affected the tensile strength of the condensation silicone; 6. Only Hemostop inhibited the polymerization of the condensation silicone; 7. The polyvinylsiloxane specimens polymerized in contact with Hemostop had significantly lower tensile strength; 8. Neither of the chemical solutions (Afrin and Vislin) affected the tensile strength of the polyvinylsiloxane and the condensation silicone; 9. Results of ...


Subject(s)
Dental Impression Technique , Dental Impression Materials/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis , Dimethylpolysiloxanes/chemistry , Gingiva/drug effects , Materials Testing , Phase Transition , Polyvinyls/chemistry , Resins, Synthetic/chemistry , Silicone Elastomers/chemistry , Siloxanes/chemistry , Solutions/chemistry , Solutions/pharmacology , Sulfides/chemistry , Tensile Strength
2.
Rev. Salusvita (Impr.) ; 24(3): 447-468, 2005.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-475968

ABSTRACT

A cimentação adesiva de restaurações cerâmicas está diretamente relacionada ao tipo de cerâmica utilizada. A grande variedade de sistemas cerâmicos com composições distintas dificulta a escolha do tratamento superficial aplicado. Assim, a compreensão das variáveis envolvidas nesse processo abrange uma vasta área do conhecimento. Neste artigo, os autores apresentam uma revisão de literatura sobre os procedimentos necessários para a cimentação de restaurações de diferentes tipos de cerâmicas...


Subject(s)
Humans , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Dental Cements , Metal Ceramic Alloys
3.
Rev. dent. press ortodon. ortop. maxilar ; 6(6): 45-49, nov.-dez. 2001. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-308187

ABSTRACT

A proposta do presente trabalho foi avaliar dois tempos diferentes de condicionamento ácido sobre a superfície de eslmalte (15 e 60 segundos) e colar acessórios ortodônticos com resina composta com e sem hogeneizaçäo prévia das pastas, observando os resultados após o teste de cisalhamento


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Bonding , Orthodontic Brackets , Acrylic Resins
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL